Navigation

Return to the front page.

Return to the overview for this issue of CCC.

Access a full text PDF of this article. (Note: PDFs are available through NCTE, or JSTOR for issues prior to Volume 48. Site subscription may be required.)

Delicious Bookmark this entry on Delicious

CiteULike Bookmark this entry on CiteULike.

Print this entry.

[need to do a plaintext style sheet for entries]

Then below here, we'll add the lower navbar stuff from the original version, inc. site search, tag search, categories, issue bar, etc.)

Jessica Reyman. Copyright, Distance Education, and the TEACH Act: Implications for Teaching Writing.

Reyman, Jessica. "Copyright, Distance Education, and the TEACH Act: Implications for Teaching Writing." CCC 58.1 (2006): 30-45.

Abstract:

The Technology, Education, and Copyright Harmonization (TEACH) Act of 2002 was developed to update copyright law to accommodate the uses of copyrighted materials in distance-education environments. This article presents an analysis of the TEACH Act and its implications for teaching writing, with an aim toward building awareness among faculty and administrators so that they can become part of the critical conversation about copyright law as it affects teaching and learning with technology.

Works Cited
Bell, Tom W. "Fair Use v. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine." North Carolina Law Review. 76 (1998): 557-619.
Bolter, Jay David. Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
Buranen, Lise, and Alice M. Roy, eds. Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World. New York: SUNY, 1999.
Burk, Dan L. and Julie E. Cohen. "Fair Use Infrastructure for Rights Management Systems." Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. 15.1 (2001): 41-83.
Bruffee, Kenneth A. "Collaborative Learning and the 'Conversation of Mankind.'" College English 46.7 (1984): 635-652.
Carnevale, Dan. "Slow Start for Long- Awaited Easing of Copyright Restrictions." Chronicle of Higher Education 28 March 2003: A29.
CCCC Caucus on Intellectual Property. "Use Your Fair Use: Strategies toward Action." CCC 51.3: (2000). 485-88.
Copyright, Plagiarism, and Intellectual Property. Spec. issue of Kairos: A Journal for Teachers of Writing in Webbed Environments. 3.1 (1998). 3 Jan. 2006. http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/3.1/.
Crews, Kenneth D. "New Copyright Law for Distance Education: The Meaning and Importance of the TEACH Act." 30 Sept. 2002. American Library Association. 25 Aug. 2003. http://web.archive.org/web/20021127113330 or http://www.ala.org/washoff/teach.html.
Foster, Andrea L. "College Media Group Cautions That 2 Copyright Laws Could Collide." Chronicle of Higher Education 18 March 2003. 3 Jan. 2006 http://chronicle.com/free/2003/03/2003031801t.htm.
Gasaway, Laura N. "Impasse: Distance Learning and Copyright." Ohio State Law Journal. 62 (2001): 783-820.
---. TEACH Act Comparison Chart. 2002. 27 May 2005 http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/TEACH.htm.
Gurak, Laura J., and Johndan Johnson- Eilola, eds. Computers, Composition, and Intellectual Property. Spec. issue of Computers and Composition. 15.2 (1998).
Herrington, TyAnna K. Controlling Voices: Intellectual Property, Humanistic Studies, and the Internet. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2001.
Howard, Rebecca Moore. Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex, 1999.
Landow, George P. Hypertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1997.
LeFevre, Karen Burke. Invention as a Social Act. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1987.
Le Moal-Gray, Michele J. "Distance Education and Intellectual Property: The Realities of Copyright Law and the Culture of Higher Education." Touro Law Review. 16 (2000): 981-1035.
Lessig, Lawrence. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin, 2004.
Lipinski, Tomas A. "Legal Reform in an Electronic Age: Analysis and Critique of the Construction and Operation of S. 487, the Technology, Education and Copyright Harmonization (TEACH) Act of 2001." Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal. 95 (2003): 95-164.
Lunsford, Andrea A., and Lisa Ede. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1990.
Lunsford, Andrea A., and Susan West. "Intellectual Property and Composition Studies." CCC 47.3 (1996): 383-411.
Patterson, L. Ray, and Stanley W. Lindberg. The Nature of Copyright: A Law of Users' Rights. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1991.
Silberberg, Carol M. "Preserving Educational Fair Use in the Twenty-First Century." Southern California Law Review. 74 (2001): 617-655.
Spigelman, Candace. Across Property Lines: Textual Ownership in Writing Groups. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2000.
United States. Copyright Office. Report on Copyright and Digital Distance Education. Washington: U.S. Copyright Office, 1999. 27 May 2005 http://www.copyright.gov/reports/de_rprt.pdf.
---. House of Representatives. Statement by Marybeth Peters. The Register of Copyrights before the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property. 107th Cong., 1st sess. Washington: GPO, 2001. 27 May 2005 http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat062701.html.
---. Senate. Technology, Education and Copyright Harmonization Act of 2001. 107th Cong., 1st sess. S. Rept. 107-031.
Washington: GPO, 2001. 3 Jan. 2006 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/R?cp107:FLD010:@1(sr031).
Vaidhyanathan, Siva. "Fair Use in (In)Action." Blog posting. 7 Jul. 2004. Sivacracy.net. 27 May 2005 http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/2004/07/fair-use-ininaction.html.
____________
Tags (?)

Works Citing