Navigation

Return to the front page.

Return to the overview for this issue of CCC.

Access a full text PDF of this article. (Note: PDFs are available through NCTE, or JSTOR for issues prior to Volume 48. Site subscription may be required.)

Delicious Bookmark this entry on Delicious

CiteULike Bookmark this entry on CiteULike.

Print this entry.

[need to do a plaintext style sheet for entries]

Then below here, we'll add the lower navbar stuff from the original version, inc. site search, tag search, categories, issue bar, etc.)

Philip Eubanks and John D. Schaeffer. A Kind Word for Bullshit: The Problem of Academic Writing.

Eubanks, Philip and John D. Schaeffer. "A Kind Word for Bullshit: The Problem of Academic Writing." CCC 59.3 (2008): 372-388.

Abstract:

The phrase "academic bullshit" presents compositionists with a special dilemma. Because compositionists study, teach, and produce academic writing, they are open to the accusation that they both tolerate and perpetuate academic bullshit. We argue that confronting this problem must begin with a careful definition of "bullshit" and "academic bullshit." In contrast to Harry Frankfurt's checklist method of definition, we examine "bullshit" as a graded category. We suggest that some varieties of academic bullshit may be both unavoidable and beneficial.

Works Cited
Barry, Dave. "College, Anyone? A Veteran's Crash Course in Campus Survival." Chicago Tribune 24 July 1983: I14.
Coleman, Linda, and Paul Kay. "Prototype Semantics: The English Word Lie." Language 57 (1981): 26-44.
Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 1992.
Frankfurt, Harry G. On Bullshit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2005.
Isocrates. Antidosis. Trans. George Norlin. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1952.
Lanham, Richard A. Revising Prose. 5th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2007.
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991.
Mohr, Charles. "Letter: Covering Washington." New York Review of Books 33.18 (20 November 1986): 58.
Morgan, Iwan W. Nixon. London: Arnold, 2002.
Neel, Jasper. Plato, Derrida, and Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1988.
Ong, Walter J. Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1981.
Penny, Laura. Your Call Is Important to Us: The Truth about Bullshit. New York: Crown, 2005.
Perry, William. "Examsmanship and the Liberal Arts." The Dolphin Reader. Ed. Douglas Hunt. 6th ed. Boston: Houghton, 2003. 60-71.
Secor, Marie, and Lynda Walsh. "A Rhetorical Perspective on the Sokal Hoax: Genre, Style, and Context." Written Communication 21.1 (2004): 69-91.
Tversky, Amos, and Itamar Gati. "Studies of Similarity." Cognition and Categorization. Ed. Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
Weaver, Richard. "The Rhetoric of Social Science." The Ethics of Rhetoric. Chicago: H. Regnery, 1953.
Williams, Joseph. Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. 8th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan, 1958.
____________
Tags (?)

Works Citing