Navigation
Return to the front page.
Return to the overview for this issue of CCC.
Access a full text PDF of this article. (Note: PDFs are available through NCTE, or JSTOR for issues prior to Volume 48. Site subscription may be required.)
Bookmark this entry on Delicious
Bookmark this entry on CiteULike.
Print this entry.
[need to do a plaintext style sheet for entries]
Then below here, we'll add the lower navbar stuff from the original version, inc. site search, tag search, categories, issue bar, etc.)
Moskovitz, Cary and David Kellogg. "Primary Science
Communication in the First-Year Writing Course." CCC 57.2 (2005):
307-334.
Abstract:
Despite the widespread acceptance of many kinds of
nonliterary texts for first-year writing courses, primary scientific
communication (PSC) remains largely absent. Objections to including PSC,
especially that it is not rhetorically appropriate or sufficiently rich, do not
hold. We argue for including PSC and give some practical suggestions for
developing courses and designing assignments using PSC.
- Works Cited
- Bartholomae, David, and Anthony Petrosky. Ways of
Reading : An Anthology for Writers. 7th ed. New York: Bedford, 2004.
- Bazerman, Charles. The Informed Reader: Contemporary
Issues in the Disciplines. Boston: Houghton, 1989.
- ---. The Informed Writer: Using Sources in the
Disciplines. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton, 1985.
- Beaufort, Anne. Writing in the Real World: Making the
Transition from School to Work. New York: Teachers College P, 1999.
- Behrens, Laurence, and Leonard J. Rosen. Writing and
Reading Across the Curriculum. 7th ed. New York: Addison, 2000.
- Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin. Genre
Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/ Power.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995.
- Bizzell, Patricia, and Bruce Herzberg.
"Writing-Across-the-Curriculum Textbooks: A Bibliographic Essay." Rhetoric
Review 3.2 (1985): 202-17.
- Booth, Wayne C., Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams.
The Craft of Research. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995.
- Britton, James. "What's the Use? A Schematic Account of
Language Functions." Educational Review 23 (1971): 205-19.
- Carraher, David, and Analucia D. Schliemann. "The Transfer
Dilemma." Journal of the Learning Sciences 11.1 (2002): 1-24.
- Crowley, Sharon, and Debra Hawhee. Ancient Rhetorics for
Contemporary Students. 3rd ed. New York: Longman, 2004.
- Day, Robert. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper.
5th ed. Phoenix: Oryx, 1998.
- Fahnestock, Jeanne. "Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical
Life of Scientific Facts." Written Communication 3 (1986): 275-96. Rpt.
in The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing.
Ed. Murdo William McRae. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1993. 17-36.
- Fahnestock, Jeanne, and Marie Secor. "Classical Rhetoric:
The Art of Argumentation." Argument Revisited, Argument Redefined:
Negotiating Meaning in the Composition Classroom. Ed. Barbara Emmel, Paula
Resch, and Deborah Tenney. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996. 97-123.
- Graff, Gerald. Clueless in Academe: How Schooling
Obscures the Life of the Mind. New Haven: Yale UP, 2003.
- Halpern, Diane F., and Milton D. Hakel. "Applying the
Science of Learning to the University and Beyond: Teaching for Long-Term
Retention and Transfer." Change 35.4 (2003): 36-41.
- Kelly, Gregory J., and Charles Bazerman. "How Students
Argue Scientific Claims: A Rhetorical-Semantic Analysis." Applied Linguistics
24.1 (2003): 28-55.
- Kennedy, Mary Lynch, William J. Kennedy, and Hadley M.
Smith. Writing in the Disciplines: A Reader for Writers. 5th ed. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice, 2004.
- Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1970.
- Latour, Bruno. Science in Action: How to Follow
Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1987.
- Lee, J. W., B. Melgaard, C. J. Clements, M. Kane, E. K.
Mulholland, and J. M. Oliv�. "Autism, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, and MMR
Vaccine." Lancet 351 (1998): 905.
- Lentricchia, Frank, and Andrew Dubois, eds. Close
Reading: The Reader. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2003.
- Losey, John E., Linda S. Rayor, and Maureen E. Carter.
"Transgenic Pollen Harms Monarch Larvae." Nature 399 (1999): 214.
- Maimon, Elaine P., Gerald L. Belcher, Gail W. Hearn,
Barbara F. Nodine, and Finbarr W. O'Connor. Writing in the Arts and Sciences.
Boston: Little, 1981.
- Martin, J. R. "Technicality and Abstraction: Language for
the Creation of Specialized Texts." Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive
Power. M. A. K. Halliday and J. R. Martin. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P,
1993. 203-20.
- McLeod, Susan, and Elaine Maimon. "Clearing the Air: WAC
Myths and Realities." College English 62.5 (2000): 573-83.
- Mitchell, W. J. T. "The Photographic Essay: Four Case
Studies." Ways of Reading Words and Images. David Bartholomae and Anthony
Petrosky. New York: Bedford, 2003. 332-74.
- Monroe, Jonathan. "Writing and the Disciplines." Peer
Review 6.1 (Fall 2003): 4-7. 14 Dec. 2003 http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-fa03/pr-fa03feature1.cfm.
- Penrose, Ann M., and Steven B. Katz. Writing in the
Sciences: Exploring Conventions of Scientific Discourse. 2nd ed. New York:
Pearson, 2004.
- Pollack, Henry N. Uncertain Science . . . Uncertain
World. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.
- Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. Writing Arguments: A
Rhetoric with Readings. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn, 1998.
- Russell, David R. Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A
Curricular History. 2nd ed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002.
- Swales, John M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and
Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990.
- Watson, J. D., and F. H. C. Crick. "A Structure for
Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid." Nature 171 (1953): 737-78.
____________
Works Citing