Navigation

Return to the front page.

Return to the overview for this issue of CCC.

Access a full text PDF of this article. (Note: PDFs are available through NCTE, or JSTOR for issues prior to Volume 48. Site subscription may be required.)

Delicious Bookmark this entry on Delicious

CiteULike Bookmark this entry on CiteULike.

Print this entry.

[need to do a plaintext style sheet for entries]

Then below here, we'll add the lower navbar stuff from the original version, inc. site search, tag search, categories, issue bar, etc.)

Phillip Arrington. A Dramatistic Approach to Understanding and Teaching the Paraphrase.

Arrington, Phillip. "A Dramatistic Approach to Understanding and Teaching the Paraphrase." CCC 39.2 (1988): 185-197.

Abstract:

This article argues that paraphrasing is an important rhetorical activity; students who paraphrase well know how to interpret an original text and revise it to fit into a new rhetorical situation. The author suggests that instructors use Burke's dramatistic framework to teach paraphrase, as the pentad terms help students analyze the original text and identify features to stress, reduce, and amplify in their paraphrase. Paraphrasing links reading and writing, and as the author argues, should be one of the central, recurring focuses of the college composition classroom. The article gives several examples and exercises that teachers can use to incorporate paraphrasing in their courses, including asking students to both compose their own paraphrases and to rhetorically analyze others' paraphrases.
Works Cited
Altieri, Charles. Act and Quality: A Theory of Literary Meaning and Humanistic Understanding. Amherst: U of Mass P, 1981.
Anderson, T.H. "Study Strategies and Adjunct Aids." Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Ed. R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, and W.F. Brewer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980. 483-502.
Bazerman, Charles. "What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (September 1981): 361-87.
Brown, A.L., J. D. Day, and R. S. Jones. "The Development of Plans for Summarizing Texts." Child Development 54 (August 1983): 968-79.
Burke, Kenneth. A Grammar of Motives. 1945. Berkeley: U of California P, 1969.
D'Angelo, Frank. "The Art of the Paraphrase." CCC 30 (October 1979): 255-59.
Erasmus, Desiderius. On Copia of Words and Things. Trans. Donald B. King et al. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette UP, 1963.
Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. "The Dynamics of Composing: Making Plans and Juggling Constraints." Cognitive Processes in Writing. Ed. L.W. Gregg and E.R. Steinberg. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980. 3-30.
Gilbert, G.N. "Referencing as Persuasion." Social Studies of Science 7 (February 1977): 113-22.
Kennedy, Mary Lynch. "The Composing Process of College Students Writing from Sources." Written Communication 2 (October 1985): 434-56.
Murphy, James J. "Rhetorical History as a Guide to the Salvation of American Reading and Writing: A Plea for Curricular Courage." The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing. Ed. James J. Murphy. New York: MLA, 1982. 3-12.
Quintilian. Lnstitutio Oratoria. Trans. H.E. Butler. 4 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1920.
Rarteray, Oswald M.T. "Expanding Roles for Summarized Information." Written Communication 2 (October 1985): 457-72.
Sherrard, Carol. "Summary Writing: A Topographical Study." Written Communication 3 (July 1986): 324-43.
Volosinov, V.N. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. Ladislav Matejka and I.R. Titunik. New York: Seminar, 1973.
Whitehead, Alfred North. Science and the Modern World. New York: Free Press, 1925.
____________
Tags (?)

Works Citing